After studying a piece of journalism and academic writing
and engaging in a group discussion with my tutorial group, we found some key
ways to make our work more interesting to read.
Visual evidence (graphs, diagrams and photographs) really
hold our attention when reading a piece of writing as it creatively displays a
key concept or idea a text is trying to explain. This makes the text more
varied which keeps the reader engaged. My academic article I explored on
globalisation made use of a lot of rhetorical questions which engages the reader
by involving them. Tailored language to make it more accessible for target
readers is also important because experts can be bored by concise summaries
whereas beginners may be put off by multiple uses of complicated and technical
language. Sentence length and writing structure is also important in order to
keep the reader engaged and not bored. Sentences need to be succinct with key
points made clear as opposed to waffling on as this will help the reader
understand the writing and thus be more interested. Structure is essential,
without it a piece of writing can be confusing and the key point of the writing
may be confused or lost. One idea raised was the use of subheadings and we all
agreed that we did find this very helpful when reading academic and press
articles.
In terms of content, we also discussed that radical ideas
although they can be memorable can be very frustrating to read and can put off
the reader. We agreed that we preferred even debates in writing as opposed to
one-sided bias perspectives with no consideration for other opinions. This is
important in engaging the reader as it can entice them to read further in order
to learn more about other points of view on the subject. That said, radical
views can leave a lasting imprint on a reader’s memory as mentioned by one of
the members of our group however it can leave a reader livid afterwards.
Looking at Orwell’s rules of writing, we came to an
agreement that writing needs to have a balanced view on a topic as well as a
perfect balance between concise beginner level writing to expert work. Writings
which are too concise with lack of depth and length can be extremely
disengaging to those who have a small knowledge of a subject. Furthermore,
Orwell’s statement of using more everyday words as opposed to scientific words
can be off-putting when writing academically as your work can be seen to be
unintelligent and lack depth.
No comments:
Post a Comment